EmLogic AS vs Developex: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
EmLogic AS (4.0/5) edges ahead of Developex (3.9/5) overall. EmLogic AS is the better choice for zephyr RTOS firmware development and migration. Developex is the stronger option for cross-platform software programs that also need device firmware and drivers. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
EmLogic AS vs Developex: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | EmLogic AS | Developex |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2021 | 2001 |
| HQ | Norway | Kyiv, Ukraine (representative office in Canada) |
| Team size | Not published | 255 |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Founding team with prior embedded-company-building experience concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS | Cross-platform team-formation model spanning mobile, cloud, web, and desktop, with firmware as a named secondary specialty |
| Pricing model | Project-based embedded design engagements | Team-formation and project-based engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Zephyr RTOS, FPGA, C | C, C++, Device Drivers |
| Industries served | Industrial, IoT hardware | Consumer electronics, Software-driven products |
EmLogic AS vs Developex: overview
EmLogic AS
EmLogic AS was founded on January 1, 2021 by Michal Koziel, Snorre Meland, Sven Ivar Mørch, and Espen Tallaksen, each with prior experience founding similar embedded companies, and operates as part of the TechSeed group in Norway. The firm specializes in embedded software, FPGA, and hardware design, with particular depth in Zephyr RTOS, the Linux Foundation-hosted real-time operating system that has become a de facto industry standard for secure, low-power connected devices. Its recency as a company means a shorter public track record than most competitors, offset by founders who each carry prior embedded-industry company-building experience.
Developex
Developex was founded in Kyiv, Ukraine in August 2001 and has grown to approximately 255 employees, with a representative office in Canada supplementing its Eastern European delivery base. Its primary stated service is forming software development teams for mobile, cloud, web, and desktop projects, with a second specialization in software for electronic devices covering firmware, drivers, and companion apps. That ordering matters for buyers: firmware capability exists and is real, but it sits behind a larger cross-platform software practice rather than being the firm's lead identity.
Services and capabilities: EmLogic AS vs Developex
| Capability | EmLogic AS | Developex |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✗ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✗ | ✗ |
| Functional safety / compliance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design / board bring-up | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: EmLogic AS vs Developex
| Framework / platform | EmLogic AS | Developex |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA | N/A | N/A |
| Secure Boot | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| RISC-V | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: EmLogic AS vs Developex
| Criterion | EmLogic AS | Developex |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Project-based embedded design | Team formation, Project-based development |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: EmLogic AS vs Developex
| Dimension | EmLogic AS | Developex |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial, IoT hardware | Consumer electronics, Software-driven products |
| Best use cases | Migration of existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr, New product firmware built natively on Zephyr RTOS | Device driver and firmware development paired with a companion cross-platform application, Team formation for a project needing both firmware engineers and mobile or web developers |
| Typical project type | Project-based embedded design | Team formation |
EmLogic AS vs Developex: pros and cons
| EmLogic AS | |
|---|---|
| + | Zephyr RTOS specialization targets the real-time operating system the Linux Foundation and much of the industry now treat as the de facto standard |
| + | All four founders bring prior experience founding similar embedded companies, not first-time entrepreneurship |
| + | FPGA and hardware design capability alongside firmware covers projects that need custom logic as well as MCU code |
| + | Part of the TechSeed group in Norway, giving it access to a broader company-building network |
| - | Founded in 2021, giving it the shortest public operating history of any company on this list |
| - | Public team size and detailed case study history are not yet published |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
| Developex | |
|---|---|
| + | 24 years of operating history with a team that has grown to roughly 255 people across three continents |
| + | Cross-platform mobile, cloud, web, and desktop capability suits firmware projects that also need a substantial companion application |
| + | Canadian representative office supplements its Eastern European delivery base for North American client coordination |
| + | Named second specialization in device firmware and drivers means the capability is deliberate, not accidental |
| - | Firmware and drivers are explicitly the company's second specialization behind its cross-platform software practice, not its lead identity |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
| - | Public case studies specific to firmware projects, versus its broader software portfolio, are limited |
Who should choose EmLogic AS?
A typical fit: migration of existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr.
Founding team with prior embedded-company-building experience concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial, IoT hardware.
Who should choose Developex?
A typical fit: device driver and firmware development paired with a companion cross-platform application.
Cross-platform team-formation model spanning mobile, cloud, web, and desktop, with firmware as a named secondary specialty. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Software-driven products.
Decision matrix: EmLogic AS vs Developex
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: EmLogic AS (Not published) vs Developex (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EmLogic AS |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Developex |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: EmLogic AS vs Developex
| Use case | EmLogic AS fit | Developex fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Migration of existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr | Strong | Limited | EmLogic AS |
| New product firmware built natively on Zephyr RTOS | Strong | Limited | EmLogic AS |
| Device driver and firmware development paired with a companion cross-platform application | Limited | Strong | Developex |
| Team formation for a project needing both firmware engineers and mobile or web developers | Limited | Strong | Developex |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: EmLogic AS vs Developex
EmLogic AS (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Founding team with prior embedded-company-building experience concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS.
Developex (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need team formation for a project needing both firmware engineers and mobile or web developers. If your situation matches that, Developex is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
EmLogic AS vs Developex FAQ
Is EmLogic AS better than Developex?
EmLogic AS (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. EmLogic AS's strongest advantage: zephyr RTOS specialization targets the real-time operating system the Linux Foundation and much of the industry now treat as the de facto standard. Developex's strongest advantage: 24 years of operating history with a team that has grown to roughly 255 people across three continents.
How do EmLogic AS and Developex differ in pricing?
EmLogic AS uses project-based embedded design engagements pricing. Developex uses team-formation and project-based engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: EmLogic AS or Developex?
Developex is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between EmLogic AS and Developex?
EmLogic AS's primary differentiator is: founding team with prior embedded-company-building experience concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS. Developex's primary differentiator is: cross-platform team-formation model spanning mobile, cloud, web, and desktop, with firmware as a named secondary specialty. They also differ in team size (Not published vs 255), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial, IoT hardware vs Consumer electronics, Software-driven products).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.