EmLogic AS vs Sigma Software Group: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
EmLogic AS (4.0/5) edges ahead of Sigma Software Group (4.0/5) overall. EmLogic AS is the better choice for zephyr RTOS firmware development and migration. Sigma Software Group is the stronger option for mid-to-large programs needing firmware alongside a broader multi-industry engineering group. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
EmLogic AS vs Sigma Software Group: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | EmLogic AS | Sigma Software Group |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2021 | 2002 |
| HQ | Norway | Kharkiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | Not published | 1,100+ |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Founding team with prior embedded-company-building experience concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS | Majority Swedish ownership since 2006 combined with a 1,100-plus person multi-country delivery footprint |
| Pricing model | Project-based embedded design engagements | Project-based and staff augmentation engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Zephyr RTOS, FPGA, C | C, C++, Embedded Middleware |
| Industries served | Industrial, IoT hardware | Aviation, Gaming, Telecom, Industrial IoT |
EmLogic AS vs Sigma Software Group: overview
EmLogic AS
EmLogic AS was founded on January 1, 2021 by Michal Koziel, Snorre Meland, Sven Ivar Mørch, and Espen Tallaksen, each with prior experience founding similar embedded companies, and operates as part of the TechSeed group in Norway. The firm specializes in embedded software, FPGA, and hardware design, with particular depth in Zephyr RTOS, the Linux Foundation-hosted real-time operating system that has become a de facto industry standard for secure, low-power connected devices. Its recency as a company means a shorter public track record than most competitors, offset by founders who each carry prior embedded-industry company-building experience.
Sigma Software Group
Sigma Software Group was founded in Kharkiv, Ukraine in 2002 by five friends and now employs more than 1,100 people across Ukraine, Sweden, Poland, and the United States. In 2006 the Swedish IT conglomerate Sigma Group acquired a 60% stake in the company, an ownership structure that has held since; the remaining 40% stays with the original Ukrainian founders. Its embedded and IoT services cover application development, firmware, middleware, device drivers, and human-machine interfaces, delivered as one practice within a much larger portfolio spanning gaming, aviation, and telecom software.
Services and capabilities: EmLogic AS vs Sigma Software Group
| Capability | EmLogic AS | Sigma Software Group |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✗ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✗ | ✓ |
| Functional safety / compliance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Hardware co-design / board bring-up | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: EmLogic AS vs Sigma Software Group
| Framework / platform | EmLogic AS | Sigma Software Group |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA | N/A | N/A |
| Secure Boot | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| RISC-V | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: EmLogic AS vs Sigma Software Group
| Criterion | EmLogic AS | Sigma Software Group |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Project-based embedded design | Project-based engineering, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: EmLogic AS vs Sigma Software Group
| Dimension | EmLogic AS | Sigma Software Group |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial, IoT hardware | Aviation, Gaming, Telecom |
| Best use cases | Migration of existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr, New product firmware built natively on Zephyr RTOS | Device driver or middleware development as part of a broader embedded program, HMI development for an industrial or aviation-adjacent embedded product |
| Typical project type | Project-based embedded design | Project-based engineering |
EmLogic AS vs Sigma Software Group: pros and cons
| EmLogic AS | |
|---|---|
| + | Zephyr RTOS specialization targets the real-time operating system the Linux Foundation and much of the industry now treat as the de facto standard |
| + | All four founders bring prior experience founding similar embedded companies, not first-time entrepreneurship |
| + | FPGA and hardware design capability alongside firmware covers projects that need custom logic as well as MCU code |
| + | Part of the TechSeed group in Norway, giving it access to a broader company-building network |
| - | Founded in 2021, giving it the shortest public operating history of any company on this list |
| - | Public team size and detailed case study history are not yet published |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
| Sigma Software Group | |
|---|---|
| + | 1,100-plus employees across Ukraine, Sweden, Poland, and the US give substantial delivery capacity and timezone coverage |
| + | 60% Swedish ownership since 2006 brings the governance and stability of an established Scandinavian IT conglomerate |
| + | 23 years of operating history under continuous leadership from its original founding team |
| + | Multi-industry portfolio spanning aviation, gaming, and telecom means firmware engineers work alongside teams solving comparable real-time and reliability problems in other domains |
| - | Firmware and embedded work is one practice within a much broader multi-industry engineering group, not the company's sole focus |
| - | 60% ownership by Sweden's Sigma Group means the company is not independently controlled by its original Ukrainian founders |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose EmLogic AS?
A typical fit: migration of existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr.
Founding team with prior embedded-company-building experience concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial, IoT hardware.
Who should choose Sigma Software Group?
A typical fit: device driver or middleware development as part of a broader embedded program.
Majority Swedish ownership since 2006 combined with a 1,100-plus person multi-country delivery footprint. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Aviation, Gaming, Telecom, Industrial IoT.
Decision matrix: EmLogic AS vs Sigma Software Group
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: EmLogic AS (Not published) vs Sigma Software Group (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Sigma Software Group |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Sigma Software Group |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: EmLogic AS vs Sigma Software Group
| Use case | EmLogic AS fit | Sigma Software Group fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Migration of existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr | Strong | Limited | EmLogic AS |
| New product firmware built natively on Zephyr RTOS | Strong | Limited | EmLogic AS |
| Device driver or middleware development as part of a broader embedded program | Limited | Strong | Sigma Software Group |
| HMI development for an industrial or aviation-adjacent embedded product | Limited | Strong | Sigma Software Group |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Strong | Sigma Software Group |
Verdict: EmLogic AS vs Sigma Software Group
EmLogic AS (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Founding team with prior embedded-company-building experience concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS.
Sigma Software Group (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need HMI development for an industrial or aviation-adjacent embedded product. If your situation matches that, Sigma Software Group is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
EmLogic AS vs Sigma Software Group FAQ
Is EmLogic AS better than Sigma Software Group?
EmLogic AS (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. EmLogic AS's strongest advantage: zephyr RTOS specialization targets the real-time operating system the Linux Foundation and much of the industry now treat as the de facto standard. Sigma Software Group's strongest advantage: 1,100-plus employees across Ukraine, Sweden, Poland, and the US give substantial delivery capacity and timezone coverage.
How do EmLogic AS and Sigma Software Group differ in pricing?
EmLogic AS uses project-based embedded design engagements pricing. Sigma Software Group uses project-based and staff augmentation engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: EmLogic AS or Sigma Software Group?
Sigma Software Group is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between EmLogic AS and Sigma Software Group?
EmLogic AS's primary differentiator is: founding team with prior embedded-company-building experience concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS. Sigma Software Group's primary differentiator is: majority Swedish ownership since 2006 combined with a 1,100-plus person multi-country delivery footprint. They also differ in team size (Not published vs 1,100+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial, IoT hardware vs Aviation, Gaming).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.