Lemberg Solutions vs A-listware: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of A-listware (3.9/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for RTOS and secure-firmware projects needing chip-vendor partnerships. A-listware is the stronger option for staff augmentation for firmware teams needing remote engineering capacity. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs A-listware: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | A-listware |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2017 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | London, UK (R&D center in Ukraine) |
| Team size | 200+ | 51–200 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up | Remote engineering team delivery model with embedded firmware and legacy modernization as named service lines |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation | Staff augmentation and dedicated remote team engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | MISRA C, FreeRTOS, Zephyr | C, C++, Legacy System Modernization Tooling |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434) | Industrial IoT, Legacy hardware modernization |
Lemberg Solutions vs A-listware: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in Lviv in 2007 and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. Its firmware practice covers RTOS and bare-metal architecture on FreeRTOS, Zephyr, and Azure RTOS, secure boot and OTA update design, MCU and platform migration, and embedded GUI work in Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX, backed by direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip. An in-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and hardware-in-the-loop testing lets the team validate board bring-up rather than outsource it. ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications, plus MISRA-aware testing, support regulated healthcare, automotive, and industrial clients, and the company transfers full IP and source code rights to the client on delivery.
A-listware
A-listware was founded in 2017 and is headquartered in London, UK, with an R&D center in Ukraine and a reported 51 to 200 employees. The company's core model centers on delivering remote engineering teams to clients, with embedded systems and IoT development, including firmware development, legacy system modernization, and hardware integration, named among its service lines. That staff-augmentation framing distinguishes it from project-based firmware consultancies: clients typically embed A-listware engineers into their own team and processes rather than handing off a defined firmware deliverable.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs A-listware
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | A-listware |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✓ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✓ |
| Functional safety / compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design / board bring-up | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs A-listware
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | A-listware |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA | ✓ | N/A |
| Secure Boot | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| RISC-V | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs A-listware
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | A-listware |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Staff augmentation, Dedicated remote teams |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs A-listware
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | A-listware |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508) | Industrial IoT, Legacy hardware modernization |
| Best use cases | OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout, Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | Staff augmentation for an in-house firmware team needing additional remote engineering capacity, Legacy embedded system modernization for an aging industrial product |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Staff augmentation |
Lemberg Solutions vs A-listware: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor |
| + | In-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and HIL testing covers board bring-up work that many pure-software firms outsource |
| + | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, and ISO 13485 certifications plus MISRA-aware testing fit regulated medical and industrial clients |
| + | Embedded GUI capability across Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX is broader than most competitors that only support one framework |
| + | Full IP and source code rights transfer to the client on every engagement |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, so device manufacturing still requires a separate partner |
| - | Does not handle regulatory certification submissions on the client's behalf, only the supporting technical documentation |
| - | No published minimum engagement figure, so smaller teams need a scoping call before knowing if budget fits |
| A-listware | |
|---|---|
| + | Staff augmentation model gives clients direct control over embedded engineers working inside their own existing processes |
| + | Legacy system modernization is a named specialty, useful for firmware projects centered on an aging codebase rather than greenfield development |
| + | UK headquarters with a Ukraine R&D center gives Western business hours coordination with Eastern European delivery cost structure |
| + | 8 years of operating history with a reported 51 to 200 employees |
| - | Firmware development is one line among several IoT and embedded services rather than the company's sole specialty |
| - | Staff augmentation suits clients who already have in-house firmware leadership; it is a narrower fit for a client needing a fully managed project delivery |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout.
Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434).
Who should choose A-listware?
A typical fit: staff augmentation for an in-house firmware team needing additional remote engineering capacity.
Remote engineering team delivery model with embedded firmware and legacy modernization as named service lines. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Legacy hardware modernization.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs A-listware
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | A-listware |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs A-listware (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs A-listware
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | A-listware fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation for an in-house firmware team needing additional remote engineering capacity | Limited | Strong | A-listware |
| Legacy embedded system modernization for an aging industrial product | Limited | Strong | A-listware |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Strong | A-listware |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs A-listware
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up.
A-listware (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need legacy embedded system modernization for an aging industrial product. If your situation matches that, A-listware is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs A-listware FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than A-listware?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor. A-listware's strongest advantage: staff augmentation model gives clients direct control over embedded engineers working inside their own existing processes.
How do Lemberg Solutions and A-listware differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. A-listware uses staff augmentation and dedicated remote team engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or A-listware?
A-listware is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and A-listware?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. A-listware's primary differentiator is: remote engineering team delivery model with embedded firmware and legacy modernization as named service lines. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP) vs Industrial IoT, Legacy hardware modernization).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.