Lemberg Solutions vs Elektrobit (EB): full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Elektrobit (EB) (4.2/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for RTOS and secure-firmware projects needing chip-vendor partnerships. Elektrobit (EB) is the stronger option for large-scale automotive firmware programs requiring ASIL D certification. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Elektrobit (EB): head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Elektrobit (EB) |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1988 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Erlangen, Germany |
| Team size | 200+ | 1,000–5,000 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up | ASIL D-certified automotive software running in more than 600 million vehicles as a Continental subsidiary |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation | Enterprise automotive software engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | MISRA C, FreeRTOS, Zephyr | MISRA C, C, C++ |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434) | Automotive |
Lemberg Solutions vs Elektrobit (EB): overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in Lviv in 2007 and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. Its firmware practice covers RTOS and bare-metal architecture on FreeRTOS, Zephyr, and Azure RTOS, secure boot and OTA update design, MCU and platform migration, and embedded GUI work in Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX, backed by direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip. An in-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and hardware-in-the-loop testing lets the team validate board bring-up rather than outsource it. ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications, plus MISRA-aware testing, support regulated healthcare, automotive, and industrial clients, and the company transfers full IP and source code rights to the client on delivery.
Elektrobit (EB)
Elektrobit traces its roots to 3SOFT, a firm founded in Erlangen, Germany in 1988 that became an automotive control-device specialist before its 2004 acquisition by the Finnish Elektrobit Group and 2015 acquisition by Continental, where it now operates as a wholly owned, independently run subsidiary. With more than 1,000 employees, its software runs in over 600 million vehicles worldwide, covering car infrastructure software, connectivity and security, automated driving tooling, and user-experience platforms up to ASIL D, the highest automotive functional-safety level. That scale and certification depth make it one of the largest and most safety-credentialed firms on this list, at the cost of the flexibility a smaller boutique firmware team can offer.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Elektrobit (EB)
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Elektrobit (EB) |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✓ | ✓ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Functional safety / compliance | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design / board bring-up | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Elektrobit (EB)
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Elektrobit (EB) |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA | ✓ | ✓ |
| Secure Boot | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| RISC-V | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Elektrobit (EB)
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Elektrobit (EB) |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Enterprise automotive software programs |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Elektrobit (EB)
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Elektrobit (EB) |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Mid-market to enterprise |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508) | Automotive |
| Best use cases | OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout, Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | ASIL D-certified safety-critical automotive control software, Large-scale automated driving software platform development |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Enterprise automotive software programs |
Lemberg Solutions vs Elektrobit (EB): pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor |
| + | In-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and HIL testing covers board bring-up work that many pure-software firms outsource |
| + | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, and ISO 13485 certifications plus MISRA-aware testing fit regulated medical and industrial clients |
| + | Embedded GUI capability across Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX is broader than most competitors that only support one framework |
| + | Full IP and source code rights transfer to the client on every engagement |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, so device manufacturing still requires a separate partner |
| - | Does not handle regulatory certification submissions on the client's behalf, only the supporting technical documentation |
| - | No published minimum engagement figure, so smaller teams need a scoping call before knowing if budget fits |
| Elektrobit (EB) | |
|---|---|
| + | ASIL D certification, the highest automotive functional-safety integrity level, is a credential few firmware vendors on this list can match |
| + | Software runs in more than 600 million vehicles, an unusually large deployed-scale figure to verify a track record against |
| + | 1,000 to 5,000 employees give it enterprise-scale delivery capacity for the largest automotive programs |
| + | Continental ownership since 2015 provides financial stability and tier-1 automotive supplier relationships |
| - | Wholly owned by Continental, a tier-1 automotive supplier, which is a disclosed ownership relationship worth weighing for OEMs that compete with Continental's other business lines |
| - | Enterprise scale and process overhead typically make it a poor fit for small firmware projects or startups needing fast iteration |
| - | Automotive concentration means its stated expertise carries over less directly to medical, industrial, or consumer firmware work |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout.
Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434).
Who should choose Elektrobit (EB)?
A typical fit: ASIL D-certified safety-critical automotive control software.
ASIL D-certified automotive software running in more than 600 million vehicles as a Continental subsidiary. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Elektrobit (EB)
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Elektrobit (EB) (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Elektrobit (EB)
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Elektrobit (EB) fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| ASIL D-certified safety-critical automotive control software | Limited | Strong | Elektrobit (EB) |
| Large-scale automated driving software platform development | Limited | Strong | Elektrobit (EB) |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Elektrobit (EB)
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up.
Elektrobit (EB) (4.2/5) is worth a look if you need large-scale automated driving software platform development. If your situation matches that, Elektrobit (EB) is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Elektrobit (EB) FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Elektrobit (EB)?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor. Elektrobit (EB)'s strongest advantage: ASIL D certification, the highest automotive functional-safety integrity level, is a credential few firmware vendors on this list can match.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Elektrobit (EB) differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. Elektrobit (EB) uses enterprise automotive software engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Elektrobit (EB)?
Elektrobit (EB) is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Elektrobit (EB)?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. Elektrobit (EB)'s primary differentiator is: ASIL D-certified automotive software running in more than 600 million vehicles as a Continental subsidiary. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 1,000–5,000), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP) vs Automotive).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.