Lemberg Solutions vs InTechHouse: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of InTechHouse (4.2/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for RTOS and secure-firmware projects needing chip-vendor partnerships. InTechHouse is the stronger option for enterprise programs needing a publicly disclosed, EU-certified R&D partner. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs InTechHouse: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | InTechHouse |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2003 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Bydgoszcz, Poland |
| Team size | 200+ | 51–200 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up | Publicly listed on Warsaw's NewConnect market since 2015, giving financial transparency most private firmware vendors don't offer |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation | Project-based hardware and embedded engineering |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | MISRA C, FreeRTOS, Zephyr | C, C++, Embedded Systems Programming |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434) | Industrial, Consumer electronics, Data & analytics products |
Lemberg Solutions vs InTechHouse: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in Lviv in 2007 and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. Its firmware practice covers RTOS and bare-metal architecture on FreeRTOS, Zephyr, and Azure RTOS, secure boot and OTA update design, MCU and platform migration, and embedded GUI work in Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX, backed by direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip. An in-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and hardware-in-the-loop testing lets the team validate board bring-up rather than outsource it. ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications, plus MISRA-aware testing, support regulated healthcare, automotive, and industrial clients, and the company transfers full IP and source code rights to the client on delivery.
InTechHouse
InTechHouse operates as SoftBlue S.A., a company founded in 2003 and headquartered in Bydgoszcz, Poland, listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange's NewConnect market since 2015. Its 51 to 200-person team works across hardware design, embedded systems, and data analytics, positioning itself as an EU-certified R&D partner delivering products from concept through production rather than firmware alone. Public-company status brings a level of financial disclosure and governance that privately held competitors don't carry, which can matter to enterprise procurement teams running vendor due diligence.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs InTechHouse
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | InTechHouse |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✓ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Functional safety / compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design / board bring-up | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs InTechHouse
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | InTechHouse |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA | ✓ | N/A |
| Secure Boot | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| RISC-V | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs InTechHouse
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | InTechHouse |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Project-based engineering, Concept-to-production programs |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs InTechHouse
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | InTechHouse |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508) | Industrial, Consumer electronics, Data & analytics products |
| Best use cases | OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout, Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | Concept-to-production hardware and firmware program for a new device, Embedded systems development requiring integrated data analytics |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Project-based engineering |
Lemberg Solutions vs InTechHouse: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor |
| + | In-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and HIL testing covers board bring-up work that many pure-software firms outsource |
| + | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, and ISO 13485 certifications plus MISRA-aware testing fit regulated medical and industrial clients |
| + | Embedded GUI capability across Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX is broader than most competitors that only support one framework |
| + | Full IP and source code rights transfer to the client on every engagement |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, so device manufacturing still requires a separate partner |
| - | Does not handle regulatory certification submissions on the client's behalf, only the supporting technical documentation |
| - | No published minimum engagement figure, so smaller teams need a scoping call before knowing if budget fits |
| InTechHouse | |
|---|---|
| + | Public listing on the Warsaw Stock Exchange's NewConnect market since 2015 gives financial disclosure competitors don't provide |
| + | 22 years of operating history under the SoftBlue S.A. legal entity |
| + | Combined hardware design, embedded systems, and data analytics capability covers connected-product programs beyond firmware alone |
| + | EU-certified R&D partner status can simplify grant-funded or EU-based procurement processes |
| - | 51 to 200 employees is spread across hardware, embedded, and data analytics work, not a dedicated firmware-only team |
| - | Public listing means quarterly disclosure obligations, which is a governance factor rather than a delivery one but can affect how the company discusses client work publicly |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout.
Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434).
Who should choose InTechHouse?
A typical fit: concept-to-production hardware and firmware program for a new device.
Publicly listed on Warsaw's NewConnect market since 2015, giving financial transparency most private firmware vendors don't offer. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial, Consumer electronics, Data & analytics products.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs InTechHouse
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs InTechHouse (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs InTechHouse
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | InTechHouse fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Concept-to-production hardware and firmware program for a new device | Limited | Strong | InTechHouse |
| Embedded systems development requiring integrated data analytics | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs InTechHouse
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up.
InTechHouse (4.2/5) is worth a look if you need embedded systems development requiring integrated data analytics. If your situation matches that, InTechHouse is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs InTechHouse FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than InTechHouse?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor. InTechHouse's strongest advantage: public listing on the Warsaw Stock Exchange's NewConnect market since 2015 gives financial disclosure competitors don't provide.
How do Lemberg Solutions and InTechHouse differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. InTechHouse uses project-based hardware and embedded engineering pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or InTechHouse?
InTechHouse is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and InTechHouse?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. InTechHouse's primary differentiator is: publicly listed on Warsaw's NewConnect market since 2015, giving financial transparency most private firmware vendors don't offer. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP) vs Industrial, Consumer electronics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.