Lemberg Solutions vs Oxalis Design: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Oxalis Design (4.1/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for RTOS and secure-firmware projects needing chip-vendor partnerships. Oxalis Design is the stronger option for small connected-device programs needing direct access to senior engineers. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Oxalis Design: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Oxalis Design |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2019 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Bristol, UK |
| Team size | 200+ | 2–10 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up | Founder-led two-person leadership team focused solely on electronics and embedded firmware, no broader IT practice attached |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation | Project-based electronics and embedded engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | MISRA C, FreeRTOS, Zephyr | C, C++, RF Design |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434) | Medical devices, Consumer electronics, Industrial |
Lemberg Solutions vs Oxalis Design: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in Lviv in 2007 and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. Its firmware practice covers RTOS and bare-metal architecture on FreeRTOS, Zephyr, and Azure RTOS, secure boot and OTA update design, MCU and platform migration, and embedded GUI work in Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX, backed by direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip. An in-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and hardware-in-the-loop testing lets the team validate board bring-up rather than outsource it. ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications, plus MISRA-aware testing, support regulated healthcare, automotive, and industrial clients, and the company transfers full IP and source code rights to the client on delivery.
Oxalis Design
Oxalis Design is a Bristol, UK electronics and embedded systems consultancy founded by Alex Turner and Alex Thornicroft, both experienced electronics and software engineers. The firm's stated scope covers electronics hardware and RF design, embedded software development, and connected-device development for medical, consumer, and industrial clients, from early concept through pilot builds and the transfer to production. As a small, cohesive team focused solely on electronics and embedded firmware rather than a broader product-design or general IT practice, it suits clients who want senior engineers directly on their project rather than layers of account management.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Oxalis Design
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Oxalis Design |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✓ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✓ |
| Functional safety / compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design / board bring-up | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Oxalis Design
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Oxalis Design |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA | ✓ | N/A |
| Secure Boot | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| RISC-V | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Oxalis Design
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Oxalis Design |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Project-based engineering, concept through pilot build |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Oxalis Design
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Oxalis Design |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508) | Medical devices, Consumer electronics, Industrial |
| Best use cases | OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout, Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | RF and firmware co-design for a new connected consumer device, Medical device electronics and embedded firmware from concept through pilot build |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Project-based engineering, concept through pilot build |
Lemberg Solutions vs Oxalis Design: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor |
| + | In-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and HIL testing covers board bring-up work that many pure-software firms outsource |
| + | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, and ISO 13485 certifications plus MISRA-aware testing fit regulated medical and industrial clients |
| + | Embedded GUI capability across Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX is broader than most competitors that only support one framework |
| + | Full IP and source code rights transfer to the client on every engagement |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, so device manufacturing still requires a separate partner |
| - | Does not handle regulatory certification submissions on the client's behalf, only the supporting technical documentation |
| - | No published minimum engagement figure, so smaller teams need a scoping call before knowing if budget fits |
| Oxalis Design | |
|---|---|
| + | Founded and led directly by two working electronics and software engineers, giving clients direct senior-level involvement |
| + | Focus on electronics and embedded firmware exclusively, without a broader IT or general software practice diluting attention |
| + | RF design capability in-house means wireless connectivity work doesn't require a separate specialist vendor |
| + | Serves medical, consumer, and industrial clients from concept through pilot build and transfer to production |
| - | A team of 2 to 10 people limits capacity to a small number of concurrent client programs at any time |
| - | Publicly verifiable founding date and detailed case study history are limited |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout.
Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434).
Who should choose Oxalis Design?
A typical fit: RF and firmware co-design for a new connected consumer device.
Founder-led two-person leadership team focused solely on electronics and embedded firmware, no broader IT practice attached. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Consumer electronics, Industrial.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Oxalis Design
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Oxalis Design (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Oxalis Design
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Oxalis Design fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| RF and firmware co-design for a new connected consumer device | Limited | Strong | Oxalis Design |
| Medical device electronics and embedded firmware from concept through pilot build | Limited | Strong | Oxalis Design |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Oxalis Design
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up.
Oxalis Design (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need medical device electronics and embedded firmware from concept through pilot build. If your situation matches that, Oxalis Design is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Oxalis Design FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Oxalis Design?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor. Oxalis Design's strongest advantage: founded and led directly by two working electronics and software engineers, giving clients direct senior-level involvement.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Oxalis Design differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. Oxalis Design uses project-based electronics and embedded engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Oxalis Design?
Oxalis Design is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Oxalis Design?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. Oxalis Design's primary differentiator is: founder-led two-person leadership team focused solely on electronics and embedded firmware, no broader IT practice attached. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 2–10), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP) vs Medical devices, Consumer electronics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.