Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Promwad (4.3/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for RTOS and secure-firmware projects needing chip-vendor partnerships. Promwad is the stronger option for automotive and telecom firmware bundled with electronics and PCB design. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Promwad |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2004 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Essen, Germany |
| Team size | 200+ | 146 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up | ASIL-C functional-safety experience in automotive ECU and infotainment work alongside full-stack electronics design |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation | Project-based electronics and firmware engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | MISRA C, FreeRTOS, Zephyr | MISRA C, C, C++ |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434) | Telecom & networking, Automotive & transportation, Digital TV & video streaming, Industrial automation & IIoT |
Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in Lviv in 2007 and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. Its firmware practice covers RTOS and bare-metal architecture on FreeRTOS, Zephyr, and Azure RTOS, secure boot and OTA update design, MCU and platform migration, and embedded GUI work in Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX, backed by direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip. An in-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and hardware-in-the-loop testing lets the team validate board bring-up rather than outsource it. ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications, plus MISRA-aware testing, support regulated healthcare, automotive, and industrial clients, and the company transfers full IP and source code rights to the client on delivery.
Promwad
Promwad was founded in 2004 by Roman Pakholkov and is now headquartered in Essen, Germany, with roughly 146 employees across Europe, North America, and Asia. The company covers embedded software development, hardware design, PCB layout, and enclosure design, with stated ASIL-C functional-safety work in automotive infotainment and ECU development alongside telecom, digital TV, and industrial automation projects. That combination of electronics design and firmware under one roof, plus safety-relevant automotive experience, distinguishes it from firmware-only vendors that don't carry board-level design capability.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Promwad |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✓ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✓ |
| Functional safety / compliance | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design / board bring-up | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Promwad |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA | ✓ | ✓ |
| Secure Boot | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| RISC-V | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Promwad |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Project-based engineering |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Promwad |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508) | Telecom & networking, Automotive & transportation, Digital TV & video streaming |
| Best use cases | OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout, Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | ASIL-C automotive ECU or infotainment firmware development, Combined electronics, PCB, and firmware design for a new industrial device |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Project-based engineering |
Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor |
| + | In-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and HIL testing covers board bring-up work that many pure-software firms outsource |
| + | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, and ISO 13485 certifications plus MISRA-aware testing fit regulated medical and industrial clients |
| + | Embedded GUI capability across Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX is broader than most competitors that only support one framework |
| + | Full IP and source code rights transfer to the client on every engagement |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, so device manufacturing still requires a separate partner |
| - | Does not handle regulatory certification submissions on the client's behalf, only the supporting technical documentation |
| - | No published minimum engagement figure, so smaller teams need a scoping call before knowing if budget fits |
| Promwad | |
|---|---|
| + | ASIL-C functional-safety work in automotive ECU and infotainment development is a specific, verifiable safety credential |
| + | Electronics design, PCB layout, and firmware sit inside one company rather than being split across vendors |
| + | 21 years of operating history and roughly 146 people give it more delivery capacity than most boutique firmware teams |
| + | Industry spread across telecom, automotive, digital TV, and industrial automation reduces single-sector concentration risk |
| - | ASIL-C is one level below the ASIL D some automotive safety programs require, which may not fit the most stringent projects |
| - | 146 employees spread across telecom, automotive, and industrial work means firmware specialists are shared across a broader practice, not a dedicated firmware-only team |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout.
Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434).
Who should choose Promwad?
A typical fit: ASIL-C automotive ECU or infotainment firmware development.
ASIL-C functional-safety experience in automotive ECU and infotainment work alongside full-stack electronics design. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Telecom & networking, Automotive & transportation, Digital TV & video streaming, Industrial automation & IIoT.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Promwad (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Promwad fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| ASIL-C automotive ECU or infotainment firmware development | Limited | Strong | Promwad |
| Combined electronics, PCB, and firmware design for a new industrial device | Limited | Strong | Promwad |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up.
Promwad (4.3/5) is worth a look if you need combined electronics, PCB, and firmware design for a new industrial device. If your situation matches that, Promwad is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Promwad?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor. Promwad's strongest advantage: ASIL-C functional-safety work in automotive ECU and infotainment development is a specific, verifiable safety credential.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Promwad differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. Promwad uses project-based electronics and firmware engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Promwad?
Lemberg Solutions is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Promwad?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. Promwad's primary differentiator is: ASIL-C functional-safety experience in automotive ECU and infotainment work alongside full-stack electronics design. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 146), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP) vs Telecom & networking, Automotive & transportation).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.