Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of WebbyLab (4.3/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for RTOS and secure-firmware projects needing chip-vendor partnerships. WebbyLab is the stronger option for full-cycle IoT programs spanning firmware, cloud, and mobile. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2011 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Kyiv, Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | 200+ | 120+ |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up | Full-cycle delivery from hardware selection through firmware and the connected application layer under one team |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation | Project-based full-cycle IoT engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | MISRA C, FreeRTOS, Zephyr | C, C++, IoT Connectivity Protocols |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434) | IoT hardware products, Fintech, E-commerce |
Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in Lviv in 2007 and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. Its firmware practice covers RTOS and bare-metal architecture on FreeRTOS, Zephyr, and Azure RTOS, secure boot and OTA update design, MCU and platform migration, and embedded GUI work in Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX, backed by direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip. An in-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and hardware-in-the-loop testing lets the team validate board bring-up rather than outsource it. ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications, plus MISRA-aware testing, support regulated healthcare, automotive, and industrial clients, and the company transfers full IP and source code rights to the client on delivery.
WebbyLab
WebbyLab was founded in 2011 by Anton Morozov and Viktor Turskyi and now operates from Kyiv and London with more than 120 engineers spanning hardware, firmware, and software disciplines. The firm describes itself as full-cycle, taking a connected-device project from hardware selection through firmware and the cloud or mobile application that talks to it, with IoT and embedded systems named as a core specialty alongside AI and blockchain work. Fortune 500 clients are cited among its customer base, though specific project names are not detailed publicly.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✓ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✓ |
| Functional safety / compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design / board bring-up | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA | ✓ | N/A |
| Secure Boot | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| RISC-V | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Project-based full-cycle development |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | WebbyLab |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508) | IoT hardware products, Fintech, E-commerce |
| Best use cases | OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout, Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | Full-cycle IoT product from hardware selection through firmware and its companion mobile app, Embedded firmware for a connected device requiring cloud integration |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Project-based full-cycle development |
Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor |
| + | In-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and HIL testing covers board bring-up work that many pure-software firms outsource |
| + | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, and ISO 13485 certifications plus MISRA-aware testing fit regulated medical and industrial clients |
| + | Embedded GUI capability across Qt, LVGL, and TouchGFX is broader than most competitors that only support one framework |
| + | Full IP and source code rights transfer to the client on every engagement |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, so device manufacturing still requires a separate partner |
| - | Does not handle regulatory certification submissions on the client's behalf, only the supporting technical documentation |
| - | No published minimum engagement figure, so smaller teams need a scoping call before knowing if budget fits |
| WebbyLab | |
|---|---|
| + | Full-cycle scope covering hardware, firmware, and the connected cloud or mobile application reduces the number of vendors a client needs to coordinate |
| + | 120-plus engineers gives more concurrent-program capacity than most boutique firmware consultancies |
| + | 14 years of operating history under its original two founders |
| + | Fortune 500 client relationships are cited, indicating capacity for large-organization procurement processes |
| - | IoT and embedded is one specialty alongside AI, blockchain, fintech, and e-commerce work, not the company's sole focus |
| - | Specific named case studies with verifiable project details are limited in public materials |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement threshold |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout.
Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP), Transportation & Logistics (ISO 26262, IEC 61508), Manufacturing & Industrial IoT (IEC 62443), Consumer Electronics (FCC, CE/RED), Automotive (ISO 26262, ASPICE, ISO/SAE 21434).
Who should choose WebbyLab?
A typical fit: full-cycle IoT product from hardware selection through firmware and its companion mobile app.
Full-cycle delivery from hardware selection through firmware and the connected application layer under one team. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in IoT hardware products, Fintech, E-commerce.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs WebbyLab (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | WebbyLab fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCPP-compliant control firmware for an EV charging station rollout | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Firmware code audit of a fielded product ahead of a security certification | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Full-cycle IoT product from hardware selection through firmware and its companion mobile app | Limited | Strong | WebbyLab |
| Embedded firmware for a connected device requiring cloud integration | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up.
WebbyLab (4.3/5) is worth a look if you need embedded firmware for a connected device requiring cloud integration. If your situation matches that, WebbyLab is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs WebbyLab FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than WebbyLab?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: direct partner status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip gives chip-level support most firmware vendors have to route through a distributor. WebbyLab's strongest advantage: full-cycle scope covering hardware, firmware, and the connected cloud or mobile application reduces the number of vendors a client needs to coordinate.
How do Lemberg Solutions and WebbyLab differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. WebbyLab uses project-based full-cycle iot engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or WebbyLab?
Lemberg Solutions is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and WebbyLab?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status combined with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up. WebbyLab's primary differentiator is: full-cycle delivery from hardware selection through firmware and the connected application layer under one team. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 120+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging, OCPP) vs IoT hardware products, Fintech).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.