NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
NOVO Engineering (4.4/5) edges ahead of Klika Tech (4.1/5) overall. NOVO Engineering is the better choice for multi-disciplinary product programs spanning mechanical, electrical, and firmware. Klika Tech is the stronger option for IoT firmware designed around an AWS-based cloud backend from the start. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | NOVO Engineering | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2004 | 2013 |
| HQ | Vista, CA, USA | North Miami Beach, FL, USA |
| Team size | 48–60 | Not published |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Systems-engineering team averaging 16 years of experience per engineer across medical, biotech, and industrial product lines | AWS IoT and DevOps competency partner status combined with STMicroelectronics hardware partnership |
| Pricing model | Fixed-scope product engineering engagements | Project-based IoT and cloud-embedded engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, Embedded Systems Programming | AWS IoT, C, C++ |
| Industries served | Medical devices, Biotech, Printing technology, Commercial products | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Cloud-connected devices |
NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech: overview
NOVO Engineering
NOVO Engineering was founded in 2004 and is headquartered in Vista, California near San Diego, with a second location near Minneapolis and roughly 48 to 60 engineers depending on the source. The firm's services span hardware and software development, systems engineering, custom automation, and pre-production manufacturing support across medical devices, biotech instrumentation, printing technology, and commercial products. Its firmware work sits inside that broader systems-engineering practice rather than standing alone, which suits clients that need a single partner across mechanical, electrical, and firmware disciplines on one program.
Klika Tech
Klika Tech was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in North Miami Beach, Florida, with delivery centers across North America, Europe, and Asia, including a Wrocław, Poland office opened in 2021. The company builds IoT, cloud, and embedded product solutions together, holding AWS IoT and DevOps competencies alongside STMicroelectronics partner status on the hardware side, positioning itself for clients whose firmware needs to talk directly to an AWS-based backend from day one. That cloud-first framing distinguishes it from firmware vendors that treat cloud integration as an afterthought handled by a separate team.
Services and capabilities: NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech
| Capability | NOVO Engineering | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✗ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✗ | ✓ |
| Functional safety / compliance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✗ | ✓ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design / board bring-up | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech
| Framework / platform | NOVO Engineering | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA | N/A | N/A |
| Secure Boot | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| RISC-V | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech
| Criterion | NOVO Engineering | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed-scope product engineering, Pre-production manufacturing support | Project-based IoT and cloud-embedded engineering |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech
| Dimension | NOVO Engineering | Klika Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Medical devices, Biotech, Printing technology | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Cloud-connected devices |
| Best use cases | Firmware development as part of a full mechanical, electrical, and software product program, Biotech instrumentation requiring firmware alongside custom automation software | IoT device firmware designed to integrate directly with an AWS IoT backend, Combined cloud and embedded firmware development for a new connected product |
| Typical project type | Fixed-scope product engineering | Project-based IoT and cloud-embedded engineering |
NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech: pros and cons
| NOVO Engineering | |
|---|---|
| + | Engineering team averages 16 years of experience per engineer, well above the industry norm for a firm of its size |
| + | Systems engineering scope covers mechanical, electrical, and firmware together rather than firmware in isolation |
| + | Two US locations near San Diego and Minneapolis give geographic coverage for onsite client work |
| + | Pre-production manufacturing support extends past firmware delivery into getting a product built |
| - | Firmware is one discipline inside a broader systems-engineering firm, not a standalone firmware specialist brand |
| - | 48 to 60 engineers caps how many large concurrent programs the firm can run at once |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
| Klika Tech | |
|---|---|
| + | AWS IoT and DevOps competency status backs its cloud-first firmware positioning with a verifiable AWS partner credential |
| + | STMicroelectronics partner status on the hardware side pairs cloud integration with direct chip-vendor support |
| + | 12 years of operating history with delivery centers spanning North America, Europe, and Asia |
| + | Cloud-and-firmware co-design suits products where the backend and the device firmware are built by the same team from the outset |
| - | Its AWS-centric framing is a narrower fit for firmware projects that need to stay cloud-agnostic or target Azure or GCP instead |
| - | Public team size is not published, making capacity harder to gauge against other mid-size firms |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose NOVO Engineering?
A typical fit: firmware development as part of a full mechanical, electrical, and software product program.
Systems-engineering team averaging 16 years of experience per engineer across medical, biotech, and industrial product lines. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Biotech, Printing technology, Commercial products.
Who should choose Klika Tech?
A typical fit: IoT device firmware designed to integrate directly with an AWS IoT backend.
AWS IoT and DevOps competency partner status combined with STMicroelectronics hardware partnership. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Cloud-connected devices.
Decision matrix: NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | NOVO Engineering |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: NOVO Engineering (Not published) vs Klika Tech (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | NOVO Engineering |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech
| Use case | NOVO Engineering fit | Klika Tech fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firmware development as part of a full mechanical, electrical, and software product program | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Biotech instrumentation requiring firmware alongside custom automation software | Strong | Limited | NOVO Engineering |
| IoT device firmware designed to integrate directly with an AWS IoT backend | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Combined cloud and embedded firmware development for a new connected product | Limited | Strong | Klika Tech |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech
NOVO Engineering (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Systems-engineering team averaging 16 years of experience per engineer across medical, biotech, and industrial product lines.
Klika Tech (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need combined cloud and embedded firmware development for a new connected product. If your situation matches that, Klika Tech is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
NOVO Engineering vs Klika Tech FAQ
Is NOVO Engineering better than Klika Tech?
NOVO Engineering (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. NOVO Engineering's strongest advantage: engineering team averages 16 years of experience per engineer, well above the industry norm for a firm of its size. Klika Tech's strongest advantage: AWS IoT and DevOps competency status backs its cloud-first firmware positioning with a verifiable AWS partner credential.
How do NOVO Engineering and Klika Tech differ in pricing?
NOVO Engineering uses fixed-scope product engineering engagements pricing. Klika Tech uses project-based iot and cloud-embedded engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: NOVO Engineering or Klika Tech?
NOVO Engineering is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between NOVO Engineering and Klika Tech?
NOVO Engineering's primary differentiator is: systems-engineering team averaging 16 years of experience per engineer across medical, biotech, and industrial product lines. Klika Tech's primary differentiator is: AWS IoT and DevOps competency partner status combined with STMicroelectronics hardware partnership. They also differ in team size (48–60 vs Not published), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Medical devices, Biotech vs Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.