Klika Tech vs Oxalis Design: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Klika Tech (4.1/5) edges ahead of Oxalis Design (4.1/5) overall. Klika Tech is the better choice for IoT firmware designed around an AWS-based cloud backend from the start. Oxalis Design is the stronger option for small connected-device programs needing direct access to senior engineers. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Klika Tech vs Oxalis Design: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Klika Tech | Oxalis Design |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2019 |
| HQ | North Miami Beach, FL, USA | Bristol, UK |
| Team size | Not published | 2–10 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | AWS IoT and DevOps competency partner status combined with STMicroelectronics hardware partnership | Founder-led two-person leadership team focused solely on electronics and embedded firmware, no broader IT practice attached |
| Pricing model | Project-based IoT and cloud-embedded engagements | Project-based electronics and embedded engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS IoT, C, C++ | C, C++, RF Design |
| Industries served | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Cloud-connected devices | Medical devices, Consumer electronics, Industrial |
Klika Tech vs Oxalis Design: overview
Klika Tech
Klika Tech was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in North Miami Beach, Florida, with delivery centers across North America, Europe, and Asia, including a Wrocław, Poland office opened in 2021. The company builds IoT, cloud, and embedded product solutions together, holding AWS IoT and DevOps competencies alongside STMicroelectronics partner status on the hardware side, positioning itself for clients whose firmware needs to talk directly to an AWS-based backend from day one. That cloud-first framing distinguishes it from firmware vendors that treat cloud integration as an afterthought handled by a separate team.
Oxalis Design
Oxalis Design is a Bristol, UK electronics and embedded systems consultancy founded by Alex Turner and Alex Thornicroft, both experienced electronics and software engineers. The firm's stated scope covers electronics hardware and RF design, embedded software development, and connected-device development for medical, consumer, and industrial clients, from early concept through pilot builds and the transfer to production. As a small, cohesive team focused solely on electronics and embedded firmware rather than a broader product-design or general IT practice, it suits clients who want senior engineers directly on their project rather than layers of account management.
Services and capabilities: Klika Tech vs Oxalis Design
| Capability | Klika Tech | Oxalis Design |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✗ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✓ |
| Functional safety / compliance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design / board bring-up | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Klika Tech vs Oxalis Design
| Framework / platform | Klika Tech | Oxalis Design |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA | N/A | N/A |
| Secure Boot | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| RISC-V | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Klika Tech vs Oxalis Design
| Criterion | Klika Tech | Oxalis Design |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Project-based IoT and cloud-embedded engineering | Project-based engineering, concept through pilot build |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Klika Tech vs Oxalis Design
| Dimension | Klika Tech | Oxalis Design |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Cloud-connected devices | Medical devices, Consumer electronics, Industrial |
| Best use cases | IoT device firmware designed to integrate directly with an AWS IoT backend, Combined cloud and embedded firmware development for a new connected product | RF and firmware co-design for a new connected consumer device, Medical device electronics and embedded firmware from concept through pilot build |
| Typical project type | Project-based IoT and cloud-embedded engineering | Project-based engineering, concept through pilot build |
Klika Tech vs Oxalis Design: pros and cons
| Klika Tech | |
|---|---|
| + | AWS IoT and DevOps competency status backs its cloud-first firmware positioning with a verifiable AWS partner credential |
| + | STMicroelectronics partner status on the hardware side pairs cloud integration with direct chip-vendor support |
| + | 12 years of operating history with delivery centers spanning North America, Europe, and Asia |
| + | Cloud-and-firmware co-design suits products where the backend and the device firmware are built by the same team from the outset |
| - | Its AWS-centric framing is a narrower fit for firmware projects that need to stay cloud-agnostic or target Azure or GCP instead |
| - | Public team size is not published, making capacity harder to gauge against other mid-size firms |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
| Oxalis Design | |
|---|---|
| + | Founded and led directly by two working electronics and software engineers, giving clients direct senior-level involvement |
| + | Focus on electronics and embedded firmware exclusively, without a broader IT or general software practice diluting attention |
| + | RF design capability in-house means wireless connectivity work doesn't require a separate specialist vendor |
| + | Serves medical, consumer, and industrial clients from concept through pilot build and transfer to production |
| - | A team of 2 to 10 people limits capacity to a small number of concurrent client programs at any time |
| - | Publicly verifiable founding date and detailed case study history are limited |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose Klika Tech?
A typical fit: IoT device firmware designed to integrate directly with an AWS IoT backend.
AWS IoT and DevOps competency partner status combined with STMicroelectronics hardware partnership. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Cloud-connected devices.
Who should choose Oxalis Design?
A typical fit: RF and firmware co-design for a new connected consumer device.
Founder-led two-person leadership team focused solely on electronics and embedded firmware, no broader IT practice attached. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Consumer electronics, Industrial.
Decision matrix: Klika Tech vs Oxalis Design
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Klika Tech (Not published) vs Oxalis Design (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Klika Tech |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Klika Tech vs Oxalis Design
| Use case | Klika Tech fit | Oxalis Design fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| IoT device firmware designed to integrate directly with an AWS IoT backend | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Combined cloud and embedded firmware development for a new connected product | Strong | Limited | Klika Tech |
| RF and firmware co-design for a new connected consumer device | Limited | Strong | Oxalis Design |
| Medical device electronics and embedded firmware from concept through pilot build | Limited | Strong | Oxalis Design |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Klika Tech vs Oxalis Design
Klika Tech (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. AWS IoT and DevOps competency partner status combined with STMicroelectronics hardware partnership.
Oxalis Design (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need medical device electronics and embedded firmware from concept through pilot build. If your situation matches that, Oxalis Design is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Klika Tech vs Oxalis Design FAQ
Is Klika Tech better than Oxalis Design?
Klika Tech (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Klika Tech's strongest advantage: AWS IoT and DevOps competency status backs its cloud-first firmware positioning with a verifiable AWS partner credential. Oxalis Design's strongest advantage: founded and led directly by two working electronics and software engineers, giving clients direct senior-level involvement.
How do Klika Tech and Oxalis Design differ in pricing?
Klika Tech uses project-based iot and cloud-embedded engagements pricing. Oxalis Design uses project-based electronics and embedded engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Klika Tech or Oxalis Design?
Oxalis Design is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Klika Tech and Oxalis Design?
Klika Tech's primary differentiator is: AWS IoT and DevOps competency partner status combined with STMicroelectronics hardware partnership. Oxalis Design's primary differentiator is: founder-led two-person leadership team focused solely on electronics and embedded firmware, no broader IT practice attached. They also differ in team size (Not published vs 2–10), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT vs Medical devices, Consumer electronics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.