WebbyLab vs EmLogic AS: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
WebbyLab (4.3/5) edges ahead of EmLogic AS (4.0/5) overall. WebbyLab is the better choice for full-cycle IoT programs spanning firmware, cloud, and mobile. EmLogic AS is the stronger option for zephyr RTOS firmware development and migration. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
WebbyLab vs EmLogic AS: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | WebbyLab | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2011 | 2021 |
| HQ | Kyiv, Ukraine (also London, UK) | Norway |
| Team size | 120+ | Not published |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Full-cycle delivery from hardware selection through firmware and the connected application layer under one team | Founding team with prior embedded-company-building experience concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS |
| Pricing model | Project-based full-cycle IoT engagements | Project-based embedded design engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, IoT Connectivity Protocols | Zephyr RTOS, FPGA, C |
| Industries served | IoT hardware products, Fintech, E-commerce | Industrial, IoT hardware |
WebbyLab vs EmLogic AS: overview
WebbyLab
WebbyLab was founded in 2011 by Anton Morozov and Viktor Turskyi and now operates from Kyiv and London with more than 120 engineers spanning hardware, firmware, and software disciplines. The firm describes itself as full-cycle, taking a connected-device project from hardware selection through firmware and the cloud or mobile application that talks to it, with IoT and embedded systems named as a core specialty alongside AI and blockchain work. Fortune 500 clients are cited among its customer base, though specific project names are not detailed publicly.
EmLogic AS
EmLogic AS was founded on January 1, 2021 by Michal Koziel, Snorre Meland, Sven Ivar Mørch, and Espen Tallaksen, each with prior experience founding similar embedded companies, and operates as part of the TechSeed group in Norway. The firm specializes in embedded software, FPGA, and hardware design, with particular depth in Zephyr RTOS, the Linux Foundation-hosted real-time operating system that has become a de facto industry standard for secure, low-power connected devices. Its recency as a company means a shorter public track record than most competitors, offset by founders who each carry prior embedded-industry company-building experience.
Services and capabilities: WebbyLab vs EmLogic AS
| Capability | WebbyLab | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✗ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Functional safety / compliance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design / board bring-up | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: WebbyLab vs EmLogic AS
| Framework / platform | WebbyLab | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | ✓ |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA | N/A | N/A |
| Secure Boot | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| RISC-V | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: WebbyLab vs EmLogic AS
| Criterion | WebbyLab | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Project-based full-cycle development | Project-based embedded design |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: WebbyLab vs EmLogic AS
| Dimension | WebbyLab | EmLogic AS |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | IoT hardware products, Fintech, E-commerce | Industrial, IoT hardware |
| Best use cases | Full-cycle IoT product from hardware selection through firmware and its companion mobile app, Embedded firmware for a connected device requiring cloud integration | Migration of existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr, New product firmware built natively on Zephyr RTOS |
| Typical project type | Project-based full-cycle development | Project-based embedded design |
WebbyLab vs EmLogic AS: pros and cons
| WebbyLab | |
|---|---|
| + | Full-cycle scope covering hardware, firmware, and the connected cloud or mobile application reduces the number of vendors a client needs to coordinate |
| + | 120-plus engineers gives more concurrent-program capacity than most boutique firmware consultancies |
| + | 14 years of operating history under its original two founders |
| + | Fortune 500 client relationships are cited, indicating capacity for large-organization procurement processes |
| - | IoT and embedded is one specialty alongside AI, blockchain, fintech, and e-commerce work, not the company's sole focus |
| - | Specific named case studies with verifiable project details are limited in public materials |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement threshold |
| EmLogic AS | |
|---|---|
| + | Zephyr RTOS specialization targets the real-time operating system the Linux Foundation and much of the industry now treat as the de facto standard |
| + | All four founders bring prior experience founding similar embedded companies, not first-time entrepreneurship |
| + | FPGA and hardware design capability alongside firmware covers projects that need custom logic as well as MCU code |
| + | Part of the TechSeed group in Norway, giving it access to a broader company-building network |
| - | Founded in 2021, giving it the shortest public operating history of any company on this list |
| - | Public team size and detailed case study history are not yet published |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose WebbyLab?
A typical fit: full-cycle IoT product from hardware selection through firmware and its companion mobile app.
Full-cycle delivery from hardware selection through firmware and the connected application layer under one team. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in IoT hardware products, Fintech, E-commerce.
Who should choose EmLogic AS?
A typical fit: migration of existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr.
Founding team with prior embedded-company-building experience concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial, IoT hardware.
Decision matrix: WebbyLab vs EmLogic AS
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: WebbyLab (Not published) vs EmLogic AS (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | WebbyLab |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: WebbyLab vs EmLogic AS
| Use case | WebbyLab fit | EmLogic AS fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full-cycle IoT product from hardware selection through firmware and its companion mobile app | Strong | Limited | WebbyLab |
| Embedded firmware for a connected device requiring cloud integration | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Migration of existing firmware from a legacy RTOS to Zephyr | Limited | Strong | EmLogic AS |
| New product firmware built natively on Zephyr RTOS | Limited | Strong | EmLogic AS |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: WebbyLab vs EmLogic AS
WebbyLab (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Full-cycle delivery from hardware selection through firmware and the connected application layer under one team.
EmLogic AS (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need new product firmware built natively on Zephyr RTOS. If your situation matches that, EmLogic AS is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
WebbyLab vs EmLogic AS FAQ
Is WebbyLab better than EmLogic AS?
WebbyLab (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. WebbyLab's strongest advantage: full-cycle scope covering hardware, firmware, and the connected cloud or mobile application reduces the number of vendors a client needs to coordinate. EmLogic AS's strongest advantage: zephyr RTOS specialization targets the real-time operating system the Linux Foundation and much of the industry now treat as the de facto standard.
How do WebbyLab and EmLogic AS differ in pricing?
WebbyLab uses project-based full-cycle iot engagements pricing. EmLogic AS uses project-based embedded design engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: WebbyLab or EmLogic AS?
WebbyLab is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between WebbyLab and EmLogic AS?
WebbyLab's primary differentiator is: full-cycle delivery from hardware selection through firmware and the connected application layer under one team. EmLogic AS's primary differentiator is: founding team with prior embedded-company-building experience concentrated specifically on Zephyr RTOS. They also differ in team size (120+ vs Not published), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (IoT hardware products, Fintech vs Industrial, IoT hardware).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.